Anonymously written.
For your info, we have already stated our case to the management last Thursday. We have engaged the management enquiring them into getting clarifications for the new salary increment. Believe me, it did catch their attention. And on Friday, a group of staff have collectively stated their case to the advocates, hence HR. The two main issue that was brought up are the concern as the salary difference are not equitable throughout the years of difference, and that the salary gap between those with years of experience almost matches the salary of new entrant.
So far, the Carigali HR seems concerned and has been very helpful, and they are trying to seek further clarification from the Task Force. At the end, the group has demanded two things: HR to share the formulation of how the new salary is calculated and the justification on the differences for the salary adjustment. But then, there’s nothing else that can be done at this point in time.
If you choose to run petition, you can expect that it will trigger just the wrong side of the management. And look at this:
STAFF WILL REJECT
- New entrants are still getting the new salary increment regardless. So you can see yourself earning much lower than the new entrants.
- New allowance package will not kick in (your meal, travel, new salary progression, etc)
STAFF WILL ACCEPT
- We have stressed to them that loyalty will remain a concern
In the end, you see that you are in the losing end with only ONE option to choose from.
Don’t just give in to resentment! Perhaps you are angry that you are not getting what you deserve and started to compare against others. But the HR answer was that you are not supposed to make comparison. What you earn is Private & Confidential and you are not allowed to share it with others. In other words – it’s better than nothing, right?
So listen, I know that in the angry mode you’d be telling yourself that the company does not value your years of experience. The thing is, if you are an E1 in the market (a junior engineer in this case), the market does not treasure your experience and hence what they have applied here. So you would see that you are not getting much higher than the new entrants. Yes, the task force must have consisted of some older G that are probably envious to the current state in which we lack of E2, and E1 are mostly the doer nowadays. They don’t value our experience because during their times, you do not seek independence within 2 years of working experience. Well, they should wake up obviously. I doubt that there was any Technical personnel view accounted for when they came up with the salary revision.
But anyway, that’s an old issue. Let’s look ahead and work with what we have. Yes, pride should be accounted for. The company should reward us for our hard work, and differentiate performers with non-performers. But with debts of more than RM300 K, I am in no position to argue. Perhaps I should just reap the company of its knowledge and trainings, and ensure that I use this opportunity to enrich myself. Some might not be here long, but for some others, you’d realize that the package will reward you long term. They are making it up in other ways, ie. Salary progression increment which has doubled, new allowance package and revision to your current EPF. I had my first tantrum with the company on Thursday, but I soon settled off. Some say that I went back against what I believe so much, and decided to accept. But my answer is I do not want to be on the losing end.
Yes, I will accept. But at the same time, I’ll try harder into making the management listens. If I succumb to rejecting the offer, I might just not get anything. And dear friends, 16th September political uncertainty is something to ponder.
Anonymous?
5 comments:
problem with taskforces sometimes is;
they look left, they look right,
and they fail to see what is
right in front of them
anyway, i choose to take a pragmatic
view on the situation;
i get more today than i did yesterday,
and i get something today which i
would otherwise get tomorrow.
it really is as simple as that ;-)
philosophical. i should be in a taskforce 8-D
-avoch-
Imagine if we are leading the task force, having to come up with various solution of trying to satisfy everyone.
Imagine if they are to be in our position, overwork and underpaid.
Imagine how if there was that reversal order.
Would anything changed?
i doubt it.
to be fair, taskforces are appointed.
with an objective in mind.
and more importantly, with boundaries.
at the end of the day,
taskforces often comes up with options,
but not decisions.
so, id question the decision,
the boundary, and the objective ;-)
-avoch-
the deal sucks no matter how they try to justify it. and i have no other options left to choose from.
The actual options they provided are decisions that we are cornered to take. In the end, they have already decided for us.
This is what happen when other people often think they are smarter, and try to dictate our action.
Look at the government today, but look at how we responded.
Maybe its time for the company to listen, before they succumb to the same state.
Post a Comment