Jawatan Ketua Wanita.. Sila Pilih Untuk Masa Depan Anda Yang Lebih Cerah Dari Mentol Restoran di Taman Melati Ini

So, in the case of Rafidah vs Shahrizat, given the opportunity to vote and determine the future of Wanita, who would you choose?

You have the veteran contender who has served ages in the organisation, losing only once in the Ketua Election only to come back to proclaim what is rightfully hers with Shahrizat on her winning side. Then on the other side of the court you have the cunning lawyer who once said, 'My words is my honour' and all hell break loose when she defy the earlier decision by the Exco and decided to go against the the No 1.

What is wrong waiting another 3 months before being officially declared as Ketua. Some say that its because, no one would have liked the idea of being position as the Acting Head, when you know for a certain that you could have been Head all along. Why wait 3 months before you get the position, when you can do it much earlier. Why the delay? Perhaps she should have think of that before agreeing in the Aug 4 meeting with all the Exco.

That's why Planning is important! (ehem ehem.. Planning Engineer talking. Give way).

When PM made a statement that he will sort things out once he's back from his Uzbek-Turkmen trip, and that the position should not be contested, Shahrizat came out and say, 'Yes, i will contest" a day after. Hmm...

I don't know whether it will be a healthy competition, now that the voters will be split, and if Rafidah wins, she will never give away the position to Shahrizat in June, or any other month! So, she'll train some new more candidates who can take up Shahrizat anytime. In the end, what will happen to Wanita section?

I leave it up to you. Do you think the position should have been contested?